Enablement

Key Takeaways

• The internal barrier to safety investment isn’t disagreement about whether it matters. It’s that safety and labor relations are budgeted as separate line items.
• Executives move when safety investment is framed against turnover cost and workers’ comp data they already track, not against incident rates they delegate to security.
• The strongest objection, “the union will just ask for more,” is answered by peer evidence that proactive investment reduces total grievance volume.

CHROs who already see the link between behavioral health workplace violence and union grievance activity face a specific internal challenge: getting the CEO and CFO past the habit of treating safety and labor relations as separate budget conversations. This brief gives you the arguments, data framing, and objection responses to walk into that meeting and come out with approval.

The Decision You’re Driving

The organizational change this advocacy supports is simple: reclassify safety investment from an operational expense managed by security into a labor relations strategy owned by HR. That shift determines the budget category, the approval pathway, and whether the investment connects to the workforce metrics you already own.

If safety stays in operations, the CHRO doesn’t control the narrative. If it moves to workforce stabilization, it connects to turnover, workers’ comp, and engagement, which are the numbers the CFO and CEO already watch.

“If safety stays in operations, the CHRO doesn’t control the narrative. If it moves to workforce stabilization, it connects to the numbers the CFO and CEO already watch.”

Three Points That Move Executives

Point one: the retention math. Each RN departure costs roughly $61,000 in recruiting, onboarding, and lost productivity [1]. When more than one in five staff members say they’d consider leaving over safety concerns, the exposure adds up fast. Peer organizations that invested in safety saw that number drop from 22% to 7% [2]. That’s the kind of shift the CFO can model against headcount.

Point two: the workers’ comp trajectory. Violence-related claims are among the most expensive in healthcare. Peer organizations have documented 24% to 50% reductions in claims after investing [2]. Those reductions lower the experience modification rate, which means lower premiums the following year. This is financial data the CFO already tracks. You’re connecting it to a cause they may not have linked yet.

Point three: the grievance cost of waiting. Nearly 45% of nurses say reported violence gets ignored [3]. That perception is showing up in grievance filings. Every quarter that safety concerns go unaddressed, the union’s case gets stronger. Proactive investment demonstrates good faith before the grievance formalizes. Reactive investment, after the grievance, carries the implicit message that the organization only acted because it was forced to.

Data Packaged for the Budget Conversation

Present one table. Executives scan, they don’t read paragraphs in budget meetings.

Don’t present all five at once. Lead with the one that matches your CFO’s biggest concern this quarter. If it’s turnover cost, lead with the 22% to 7% drop. If it’s insurance premiums, lead with the claims reduction.

Objections You’ll Hear

“We already have safety training.” Training addresses skills. It doesn’t address the 45% of staff who say nothing changes after they report an incident [3]. The investment you’re proposing closes the gap between training and visible organizational response.

“The union will just demand more.” Peer data shows the opposite. Organizations that invested proactively saw grievance volume decrease, not increase [2]. When the union’s core demand is met with measurable evidence, the conversation shifts from escalation to collaboration.

“Show me the ROI before I commit.” Point to the retention math and workers’ comp data. Peer organizations documented measurable returns within the first six months [2]. A bounded pilot on one high-risk unit gives the CFO a way to verify the numbers before committing to enterprise scale.

The Ask

Propose a bounded pilot: one high-acuity unit, 90 days, with three success metrics tied to the data you just presented.

• Intent-to-leave on the pilot unit before and after
• Workers’ comp claim trajectory on the pilot unit
• Staff safety sentiment scores before and after

If the pilot produces the outcomes peer organizations have documented, the case for expansion writes itself. If it doesn’t, the investment was bounded and the data is clear.

Walk in with the table, the three points, and the pilot proposal. That’s enough to get a yes.

References

1. NSI Nursing Solutions. “2025 National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report.” 2025.
2. ROAR for Good. “National Behavioral Healthcare Provider Case Study.” 2024.
3. National Nurses United. “High and Rising Rates of Workplace Violence Report.” February 2024.
4. AHRQ PSNet. “Addressing Workplace Violence and Creating a Safer Workplace.” 2023.